Discuss how global social and economic pressures affect
medical practices. Instructions ? Read Holtz, Chapter 16: “Global Perspectives
on Environmental Health” pp. 409–426 ? Choose one of the following: air
pollution, water pollution, or food pollution. ?Design a 1-page flyer/handout
about the specific pollution and its effect on health and prevention. ? It
should be geared towards high school students. Be sure to include: explanation
of the type of pollution you choose, its effects on health, methods of
prevention, and include your references. ? When you are done, submit it in the Dropbox.
Requirements ? This Assignment should be 1 page in length, include a reference
and be designed for high school students. ?This Assignment may use Microsoft
Word, PowerPoint, or Publisher®. Please be sure to download the file “Writing
Center Resources” fromDoc Sharing to assist you with meeting APA expectations
for written Assignments. Submitting Your Work Put your responses in a
MicrosoftWord, PowerPoint, or Publisher document. Save it in a location and with
the proper naming convention: username-CourseName-section-Unit4_Assignment.doc
Unit 4 [HW215: Models for Health and Wellness](username is your Kaplan
username, section is your course section, and 4 is your unit number). When you
are ready to submit it, go tothe Dropbox and complete the steps below: 1. Click
the link thatsays “Submit an Assignment.” 2. In the “Submit to Basket” menu, select
Unit 4: Assignment. 3. In the “Comments” field, make sure toadd at least the
title of your paper. 4. Click the “Add Attachments” button. 5. Follow the steps
listed to attach your Word document. To view your graded work, come back to the
Dropbox or go to the Gradebook after your instructor has evaluated it. Make
sure that you save a copy of your submitted Assignment. Unit 4 Assignment
Grading Rubric = 60 points Assignment Requirements Points possible Points
earned by student The flyer is to address the following: ? Explanation of the
type of pollution you choose 0-20 ?How pollution effects health 0-20 ? Identify
methods of prevention0-20 Total (Sum of all points) Points deducted for
spelling, grammar, and/or APA error
Thursday, February 18, 2016
Compose a 1,300- to 1,450-word paper in APA format that providesan overview of HIV/AIDS.
Compose a 1,300- to 1,450-word paper in APA format that
providesan overview of HIV/AIDS. Address the following:
o Explain the difference between HIV and AIDS.
o Describe various ways HIV can be transmitted.
o Identify and discuss what has changed in the immune system
whenan HIV patient becomes an AIDS patient.
o Explain why the bodys innate immunity fails in an AIDS patient.
o Describe treatments available for HIV/AIDS patients.
o Discuss precautions to prevent the spread of HIV.
o Describe at least one global awareness campaign to fight
thespread of HIV.
Based on the Readings about healthcare in other countries, choose one country
Based on the Readings about healthcare in other countries,
choose one country (Great Britain, Sweden, or Japan) and compare and contrast
its healthcare system with that of the United States. Example: ? Introduction ?
Describe the healthcare system of the other country. ? Identify two differences
between that systemand the U.S. healthcare system. ? Identify two similarities
between that system and the U.S. healthcare system. ? Identify any elements that
you would like to have incorporated into the U.S. system. ?References.
Requirements ? This Assignment needs to be 2–3 pages in length, written in APA
format, include appropriate references.
Discuss in 200- to 300-words, the importance of the science of geology to us as a civilization.
Discuss in 200- to 300-words, the importance of the science
of geology to us as a civilization. Provide at least two examples. For example,
the ability to predict earthquakes and other disasters, or understanding mining
and the use of natural resources.
Evaluate economic and financial cash flow models to analyse project risk.
LO2: Evaluate economic and financial cash flow models to
analyse project risk.
(a) Review section 14 of the information memorandum.
(i) Analyse five (5) key risks contained in the information
memorandum associated with the project that may impact the debt facility during
the term of the financing. In your answer explain why you consider each a key
risk. (10 marks)
Note: An in-depth analysis of the fundamental risks is
required to answer this question. Answers must be more than a summary of the
information memorandum. Key risks would be the risks that you judge to have the
largest impact on the debt financing.
(ii) The Lake Bonney Wind Farm project was successful.
However, the information memorandum does not discuss all relevant risks that
affect the financing.
Explain three (3) additional risks associated with the
project that may impact the debt facility during the term of the financing that
are not specifically identified in section 14. (9 marks)
Note: Remember that technical aspects of the project cannot
be changed.
(b) Describe the mitigating factors that are included in the
debt terms and conditions to reduce the risks identified in part (a)(i).
Hint: Review section 12.4 of the information memorandum. (10
marks)
(c) In order to better understand and mitigate the project
risks identified in part (a), consider what additional information you would
require that is not outlined in the information memorandum, or what changes you
would make to the information memorandum. This information and these changes
may relate to risks identified in either part (a)(i) or (a)(ii).
In your answer outline:
• the additional information you would require or research
you would undertake prior to commitment
• the additional information you would include in, or
changes you would make to, the terms and conditions of the financing.
Note: Your answer must focus on mitigating project risks.
(10 marks)
Criteria-based marking guide for Question 1
Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
(a) (i) • 5 key risks identified from information memorandum
• comprehensive analysis of key risks
• comprehensive explanation of why you consider each risk a
key risk • 5 key risks identified from information memorandum
• basic analysis of key risks
• basic explanation of why you consider each risk a key risk
• less than 3 key risks identified from information memorandum
• no or little analysis of the key risks
• no or little explanation of why you consider each risk a key
risk
(Mark range: 8–10 marks) (Mark range: 5–7.5 marks) (Mark
range: 0–4.5 marks)
(a) (ii) • 3 risks identified which are not mentioned in the
information memorandum
• comprehensive explanation of risks identified • 3 risks
identified which are not mentioned in the information memorandum
• basic explanation of risks identified • less than 2 key
risks identified which are not mentioned in the information memorandum
• no or little explanation of risks identified
(Mark range: 7–9 marks) (Mark range: 4½–6.5 marks) (Mark
range: 0–4 marks)
(b) • 5 or more mitigating factors identified from
information memorandum
• clear, substantiated and detailed explanation
demonstrating how the mitigating factors reduce risks • 4 mitigating factors
identified from information memorandum
• adequate explanation demonstrating how the mitigating
factors included reduce risks • few or no mitigating factors identified from
information memorandum
• little or no clear explanation demonstrating how the
mitigating factors included reduce risks
(Mark range: 8–10 marks) (Mark range: 5–7.5 marks) (Mark
range: 0–4.5 marks)
(c) • 3 or more correct pieces of desirable additional
information identified
• 3 or more correct desirable changes to the terms and
conditions of the financing identified • 2 correct pieces of desirable
additional information identified
• 2 correct desirable changes to the terms and conditions of
the financing identified • little or no additional information required
identified
• little or no changes to the terms and conditions
identified
(Mark range: 8–10 marks) (Mark range: 5–7.5 marks) (Mark
range: 0–4.5 marks)
Answers to Question 1(a)–(c)
End of answers to Question 1(a)–(c)
Question 2 (20 marks | Word limit: 800 words)
LO1: Assess project viability.
(a) In order to evaluate the project, potential participants
will require information in addition to what is contained in the information
memorandum. Outline what other specific information (not including material
contained in the attachments) you would require in order to evaluate the
financing. (10 marks)
Note: Do not include the same information here as you
considered in Question 1(c). In this question, you are required to consider
broader information requirements to evaluate the financing.
(b) Explain why the additional information identified in
part (a) is relevant. (10 marks)
Criteria based marking guide for Question 2
Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
(a) • 4 or more extra pieces of information required
correctly identified in addition to those contained in the attachments to the
information memorandum • at least 3 extra pieces of information required
correctly identified in addition to those contained in the attachments to the
information memorandum • little or no specific information in addition to the
information memorandum identified
• only additional information contained in the attachments
to the information memorandum identified
(Mark range: 8–10 marks) (Mark range: 5–7.5 marks) (Mark
range: 0–4.5 marks)
(b) • comprehensive explanation of why the additional
information identified in question 2(a) is relevant
• explanation specifically related to the Lake Bonney
financing • basic explanation of why the additional information identified in
question 2(a) is relevant • little or no explanation of relevance of additional
information
(Mark range: 8–10 marks) (Mark range: 5–7.5 marks) (Mark
range: 0–4.5 marks)
Answers to Question 2(a)–(b)
End of answers to Question 2(a)–(b)
Question 3 (26 marks | Word limit: 1000 words)
LO1: Assess project viability.
(a) Discuss the applicability and reasonableness of the base
case assumptions and the range of sensitivity analyses contained in section 13
of the information memorandum. (10 marks)
(b) Explain what the sensitivity analyses indicate in relation
to the project risks. (10 marks)
(c) Explain what additional sensitivities you would wish to
review. (6 marks)
Criteria based marking guide for Question 3
Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
(a) • comprehensive discussion on the reasonableness and
applicability of the base case assumptions
• comprehensive discussion on the reasonableness and
applicability of the range of sensitivity analyses
• discussion points concise and answer logical and well
structured • basic discussion on the reasonableness and applicability of the
base case assumptions
• basic discussion on the reasonableness and applicability
of the range of sensitivity analyses
• some discussion points not concise or well thought out and
structured • little or no relevant or logical discussion on either the base
case assumptions or the sensitivity analysis
(Mark range: 8–10 marks) (Mark range: 5–7.5 marks) (Mark
range: 0–4.5 marks)
(b) • correct and comprehensive interpretation of the
sensitivity analyses
• interpretation specific and focussed on the sensitivity
analyses contained in section 13 of the information memorandum
• comprehensive explanation of what the sensitivity analyses
indicate in relation to the specific project risks in the Lake Bonney financing
• correct interpretation of the sensitivity analyses
• basic explanation of what the sensitivity analyses
indicate in relation to the project risks • incorrect interpretation of the
sensitivity analyses
• little or no explanation of what the sensitivity analyses
indicate in relation to the project risks
(Mark range: 8–10 marks) (Mark range: 5–7.5 marks) (Mark
range: 0–4.5 marks)
(c) • 3 or more relevant additional sensitivities identified
• comprehensive explanation of why you would wish to review
the additional sensitivities and what these additional sensitivities would
indicate • 2 relevant additional sensitivities identified
• basic explanation of why you would wish to review the
additional sensitivities • no or little additional sensitivities identified
• no or little explanation of why you would wish to review
the additional sensitivities
(Mark range: 5–6 marks) (Mark range: 3–4.5 marks) (Mark
range: 0–2.5 marks)
Answers to Question 3(a)–(c)
End of answers to Question 3(a)–(c)
Question 4 (15 marks | Word limit: 500 words)
LO4: Develop the appropriate financial structure for a
project.
(a) Identify specific terms of the proposed term debt
facility (i.e. section 12) that cause you concern and explain why. (5 marks)
Note: Do not include the same terms discussed in Question
1(c).
(b) Explain why and how a separate construction debt
facility is being used. (5 marks)
(c) Explain how the use of shareholder loans affects the
proposed financing. (5 marks)
Criteria based marking guide for Question 4
Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
(a) • 3 or more concerns identified in regards to the
specific terms of proposed term debt facility
• comprehensive and relevant explanation of why these
specific terms may be of concern • 2 concerns identified in regards to the specific
terms of proposed term debt facility
• basic explanation of why these specific terms may be of
concern • no or inappropriate concerns identified
• concerns identified not specific in regards to the terms
of the proposed term debt facility
• little or no explanation of why terms may be of concern
(Mark range: 4–5 marks) (Mark range: 2½–3.5 marks) (Mark
range: 0–2 marks)
(b) • comprehensive explanation of why a separate
construction debt facility is being used
• comprehensive understanding of how the construction debt
facility is being used demonstrated • basic explanation of why a separate
construction debt facility is being used
• basic understanding of how the construction debt facility
is being used demonstrated • little or no explanation of why a separate
construction debt facility is being used
• little or no understanding of how the construction debt
facility is being used
(Mark range: 4–5 marks) (Mark range: 2½–3.5 marks) (Mark
range: 0–2 marks)
(c) • comprehensive explanation of how the use of a
shareholder loan affects the proposed financing • basic explanation of how the
use of a shareholder loan affects the proposed financing • little, incorrect or
no explanation of how the use of a shareholder loan affects the proposed
financing
(Mark range: 4–5 marks) (Mark range: 2½–3.5 marks) (Mark
range: 0–2 marks)
Answers to Question 4(a)–(c)
Overview of the Project - Patricia Benner This course project requires you to complete a group task
Overview of the Project - Patricia Benner This course
project requires you to complete a group task. As a group, you are required to
submit a presentation on the theorist assigned to your group. Your final
presentation is due in Week 4. Group Formation PatriciaBenner; From Novice to
Expert, the Skill Acquisition Model If your group would like to study a
different theorist, seek permission from your instructor. Each group will
conduct a literature reviewto obtain material related to the assigned theorist
and the model. The material should include research conducted in the theory or model,
with clinical examples.
As the head health care administrator at USA Community Hospital
As the head health care administrator at USA Community
Hospital, you are required to review compliance reports on issues relating to the
ethical conduct of the professional staff at your hospital, patient review
registries, and standard procedures surrounding the ethical treatment of
patients with HIV / AIDS. Intermittently, complaints surface from patients with
HIV / AIDS concerned with ethical treatment and denial of services.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Click Here To Order Now
